gofer articles

It is tough buying educational toys because, well, how would you really measure whether something is educational, especially when it involves very young children even toddlers? Actually, many child psychologists believe that just about anything is “educational” for a child, especially at really young ages when almost by definition anything they come into contact with teaches them something about the world, about which they know almost nothing!

When you do not know a lot to begin with, everything is educational, isn’t it? And so the world is full of educational toys as a result, as any object may be played with and, in the very playing with, help to develop the motor skills and cognitive abilities which toymakers claim their products foster in a child.

And yet clearly there are toys that do seem to somehow offer a lot more than entertainment value, for instance programmable robot kits. So perhaps a better way to think about educational toys is to not regard them as being completely educational or not, in which case it’s arguable that a plaything could be made of almost anything and that play itself is an inherently educational activity.

The misunderstandings, as ever (according to most semanticists, anyway), concerns semantics, or meaning. If we mean by the term not merely something that can be played with such that skillsets of some kind are fostered, but instead those toys which are clearly more capable of fostering a skillset, particularly one that is not readily developed otherwise, then shopping becomes substantially easier!

Thus, it will turn out that puzzles like a Rubik’s Cube are extremely educational while alphabet blocks are significantly less so. And as parents, we want to encourage our kids to not only explore but push their intellectual envelope, so while good old-fashioned dolls and the like might stimulate the imagination, much more ingenious toys can also stimulate such higher-order faculties as pattern recognition and problem solving.